ANNOTATIONS:
1. Bevilacqua M; Fanti G; D'Arienzo M; De Caro R, Injury [Injury], ISSN: 1879-0267, 2013 Sep 19
Bevilacqua had a great resource that explained how Image Processing helps prove the Shroud’s authenticity. It is very detailed in explaining how the man on the Shroud shares many characteristics of what Jesus’ body would have looked like after the crucifixion. In the end the evidence helps conclude that the man on the Shroud is Jesus of Nazareth.
2. Davis, Truman. "'And They Shouted, "Crucify!"...'" CRUCIFIXION of Jesus Christ: The Full Horror. N.p., 1965. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
“And they Shouted, Crucify!” by Truman Davis was an outstanding resource because it helped illustrate how Jesus was beaten, and where the bloodstains would have been. These areas where Jesus was beaten match up with the bloodstains on the Shroud. This resource helps prove the authenticity of the Shroud because there are so many similarities between it and the Shroud. The resource discusses how in Jesus’ crucifixion there was trauma to the back and head which can also be seen on the Shroud.
3. Goldoni, Carlos. "Introduction." Proc. of The Shroud of Turin and the Bilirubin Blood Stains, Ohio, Columbus. N.p.: n.p., 2008. 1-5. Print.
This resource was great for proving that the blood on the Shroud is real. This resource explains how hemoglobin and other blood particles and compounds of blood were found in the Shroud. This disproves the theory that the bloodstains were painted on the Shroud; and brings researchers closer to proving that the Shroud is real.
4. John. Holy Bible, New International Version. Biblica, 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
The excerpt from the book of John in the bible explaining Peter seeing the cloth was important for placing the Shroud with Jesus. This shows that the Shroud was mentioned and could possibly be the cloth that covered Jesus himself. This verse explains that the Shroud was made of linen which is also the same material of the Shroud today. This resource helps prove the Shroud’s authenticity.
5. Meacham, William. "The Authentication of the Turin Shroud." The Authentication of the Turin Shroud. N.p., 1983. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
“The Authentication of the Turin Shroud” by Meacham does a great job in not only proving the authentication of the Shroud as a relic, but also as an archaeological object. If the Shroud is considered an archaeological object, it is also considered or proved to be real. Meacham in this resource explains why the shroud is an archaeological object. Meacham uses data and evidence to prove to himself and others of the Shroud’s authenticity.
6. Piczek, Isabel. "Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?" Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?N.p., 1995. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
“Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?” by Isabel Piczek was a good resource because it gave a lot of information disproving the paint theory concerning the Shroud of Turin. Since the focus of website was about the Shroud and evaluating the blood evidence upon it, this was a perfect resource for stating the reasons why the bloodstains could not possibly be paint. This resource gave me three reasons why the bloodstains were real blood: Suppot, Ground, and Paints. These helped fortify that the blood was indeed real, and that because of this, the Shroud of Turin might not be a fake.
7. "Some Facts about the Turin shroud." In Caelo Et in Terra. N.p., 3 May 2010. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
I believe that the “Ten Misconceptions” was an important part of my website because if anything I want to clear any misconceptions about the Shroud. These misconceptions also help prove the Shroud’s authenticity, which I believe strongly in. Belief in the Shroud’s authenticity is prevalent in the website. The misconceptions range from refuting the image on the Shroud as a painting and casting aside assumptions that is has been copied or forged.
8. Staff. "Shroud of Turin Is an Ancient Artifact | TG Daily." TG Daily. N.p., 29 Mar. 2013. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
The Staff at TG Daily spoke of Giulio Fanti, a man that has been researching the shroud for 15 years. Fanti rejected carbon dating tests and claimed he suspected contamination. He believes that the Shroud is from Jesus himself. Because Fanti dedicated so many years into the research of the Shroud, he is a reliable source. Fanti helps to disprove the only evidence against the Shroud’s authenticity.
9. Wilson, Ian. " Shroud History." Shroud History. N.p., 1996. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Wilson did a great job in giving viewers the history of the Shroud. Ian Wilson is very well known in the scientific study of the Shroud of Turin. An almost week by week account of the Shroud was given in the resource; beginning early in the 1400s all the way until present times in 2013. A lot of information can be gleaned from this resource.
10. John. Holy Bible, New International Version. Biblica, 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
The excerpt from the book of John in the bible explaining Peter seeing the cloth was important for placing the Shroud with Jesus. This shows that the Shroud was mentioned and could possibly be the cloth that covered Jesus himself. This verse explains that the Shroud was made of linen which is also the same material of the Shroud today. This resource helps prove the Shroud’s authenticity.
11. Zaimov, Stoyan. "CP Church & Ministry." Christian Post. N.p., 12 Oct. 2013. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
This resource is important because it helps prove that the bloodstains on the Shroud of Turin are real. The resource even referenced Gary Habermas a distinguished research professor and chair of the Department of Philosophy and Theology at Liberty University. He too believes in the Shroud's authenticity.
Bevilacqua had a great resource that explained how Image Processing helps prove the Shroud’s authenticity. It is very detailed in explaining how the man on the Shroud shares many characteristics of what Jesus’ body would have looked like after the crucifixion. In the end the evidence helps conclude that the man on the Shroud is Jesus of Nazareth.
2. Davis, Truman. "'And They Shouted, "Crucify!"...'" CRUCIFIXION of Jesus Christ: The Full Horror. N.p., 1965. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
“And they Shouted, Crucify!” by Truman Davis was an outstanding resource because it helped illustrate how Jesus was beaten, and where the bloodstains would have been. These areas where Jesus was beaten match up with the bloodstains on the Shroud. This resource helps prove the authenticity of the Shroud because there are so many similarities between it and the Shroud. The resource discusses how in Jesus’ crucifixion there was trauma to the back and head which can also be seen on the Shroud.
3. Goldoni, Carlos. "Introduction." Proc. of The Shroud of Turin and the Bilirubin Blood Stains, Ohio, Columbus. N.p.: n.p., 2008. 1-5. Print.
This resource was great for proving that the blood on the Shroud is real. This resource explains how hemoglobin and other blood particles and compounds of blood were found in the Shroud. This disproves the theory that the bloodstains were painted on the Shroud; and brings researchers closer to proving that the Shroud is real.
4. John. Holy Bible, New International Version. Biblica, 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
The excerpt from the book of John in the bible explaining Peter seeing the cloth was important for placing the Shroud with Jesus. This shows that the Shroud was mentioned and could possibly be the cloth that covered Jesus himself. This verse explains that the Shroud was made of linen which is also the same material of the Shroud today. This resource helps prove the Shroud’s authenticity.
5. Meacham, William. "The Authentication of the Turin Shroud." The Authentication of the Turin Shroud. N.p., 1983. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
“The Authentication of the Turin Shroud” by Meacham does a great job in not only proving the authentication of the Shroud as a relic, but also as an archaeological object. If the Shroud is considered an archaeological object, it is also considered or proved to be real. Meacham in this resource explains why the shroud is an archaeological object. Meacham uses data and evidence to prove to himself and others of the Shroud’s authenticity.
6. Piczek, Isabel. "Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?" Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?N.p., 1995. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
“Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?” by Isabel Piczek was a good resource because it gave a lot of information disproving the paint theory concerning the Shroud of Turin. Since the focus of website was about the Shroud and evaluating the blood evidence upon it, this was a perfect resource for stating the reasons why the bloodstains could not possibly be paint. This resource gave me three reasons why the bloodstains were real blood: Suppot, Ground, and Paints. These helped fortify that the blood was indeed real, and that because of this, the Shroud of Turin might not be a fake.
7. "Some Facts about the Turin shroud." In Caelo Et in Terra. N.p., 3 May 2010. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
I believe that the “Ten Misconceptions” was an important part of my website because if anything I want to clear any misconceptions about the Shroud. These misconceptions also help prove the Shroud’s authenticity, which I believe strongly in. Belief in the Shroud’s authenticity is prevalent in the website. The misconceptions range from refuting the image on the Shroud as a painting and casting aside assumptions that is has been copied or forged.
8. Staff. "Shroud of Turin Is an Ancient Artifact | TG Daily." TG Daily. N.p., 29 Mar. 2013. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
The Staff at TG Daily spoke of Giulio Fanti, a man that has been researching the shroud for 15 years. Fanti rejected carbon dating tests and claimed he suspected contamination. He believes that the Shroud is from Jesus himself. Because Fanti dedicated so many years into the research of the Shroud, he is a reliable source. Fanti helps to disprove the only evidence against the Shroud’s authenticity.
9. Wilson, Ian. " Shroud History." Shroud History. N.p., 1996. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
Wilson did a great job in giving viewers the history of the Shroud. Ian Wilson is very well known in the scientific study of the Shroud of Turin. An almost week by week account of the Shroud was given in the resource; beginning early in the 1400s all the way until present times in 2013. A lot of information can be gleaned from this resource.
10. John. Holy Bible, New International Version. Biblica, 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
The excerpt from the book of John in the bible explaining Peter seeing the cloth was important for placing the Shroud with Jesus. This shows that the Shroud was mentioned and could possibly be the cloth that covered Jesus himself. This verse explains that the Shroud was made of linen which is also the same material of the Shroud today. This resource helps prove the Shroud’s authenticity.
11. Zaimov, Stoyan. "CP Church & Ministry." Christian Post. N.p., 12 Oct. 2013. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.
This resource is important because it helps prove that the bloodstains on the Shroud of Turin are real. The resource even referenced Gary Habermas a distinguished research professor and chair of the Department of Philosophy and Theology at Liberty University. He too believes in the Shroud's authenticity.